Head to head

Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Gen vs RODECaster Pro

A side-by-side look at Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Gen and RODECaster Pro for podcasters: pricing, features, and where each one wins.

Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Gen

The best-selling starter interface just keeps getting better

See site

Check price on Amazon

RODECaster Pro

The original all-in-one podcast console that redefined the category

See site

Check price on Amazon

At a glance

Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th GenRODECaster Pro
Starting priceSee siteSee site
Free planNoNo
Free trialNoNo
Best forSolo podcasters or vocalists who need one XLR mic input, solid preamp quality, and zero driver headachesFour-person in-studio podcast productions that want a purpose-built console with independent headphone mixes for every guest

Key features

Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Gen

  • 1 XLR mic input with 48V phantom power
  • 1 Hi-Z instrument input (front panel)
  • USB-C bus powered
  • 24-bit / 192 kHz converters
  • Switchable Air mode for high-frequency presence boost
  • 2 x 1/4" TRS monitor outputs

RODECaster Pro

  • 4 XLR mic inputs with Class A preamps and individual 48V phantom power
  • 4 independent headphone outputs with mix-minus
  • 8 programmable sound pads with 8 banks (64 total clips)
  • APHEX Aural Exciter, Big Bottom, compressor, noise gate, de-esser per channel
  • Bluetooth phone integration with automatic mix-minus
  • USB audio interface and microSD multitrack recording

Pros and cons

Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Gen

Pros

  • Best-in-class preamp quality at this price point
  • Air mode adds instant presence without EQ plugins
  • USB-C - compatible with modern laptops without dongles
  • Compact, bus-powered - takes zero desk space

Cons

  • Only one XLR input - no co-host capability
  • No MIDI I/O
  • No direct monitoring blend knob (monitor mix is software-controlled)

RODECaster Pro

Pros

  • Four XLR inputs and four headphone outputs - full panel show in one device
  • Sound pads are production-ready without additional hardware
  • APHEX processing per channel included
  • Established ecosystem with deep tutorial and user community resources

Cons

  • Original preamps lack the gain of the Pro II Revolution design
  • Firmware updates have ended - the platform is mature, not evolving
  • RODECaster Pro II is the current model and the better long-term buy

The verdict

Choose Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Gen if

Solo podcasters or vocalists who need one XLR mic input, solid preamp quality, and zero driver headaches.

The Scarlett Solo remains the interface millions of beginners start with - and for good reason. The preamp is clean, the Air mode adds useful presence on vocal-heavy content, and USB-C bus power means one cable handles everything. The hard…

Read the full Focusrite Scarlett Solo 4th Gen review →

Choose RODECaster Pro if

Four-person in-studio podcast productions that want a purpose-built console with independent headphone mixes for every guest.

The original RODECaster Pro defined a product category. Four XLR inputs with individual phantom power and APHEX processing, four headphone outputs with independent mix-minus, eight sound pads for music and effects - everything a panel podcast needs in one device.…

Read the full RODECaster Pro review →

The best new podcast tools, every week

One short email with the tools and gear worth your time. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.