Rode Procaster vs Warm Audio WA-87 R2
A side-by-side look at Rode Procaster and Warm Audio WA-87 R2 for podcasters: pricing, features, and where each one wins.
Rode Procaster
Broadcast-born dynamic built to reject the room and capture the voice
See site
Check price on Amazon
Warm Audio WA-87 R2
U87-style FET condenser with three polar patterns at a fraction of the price
See site
Check price on AmazonAt a glance
| Rode Procaster | Warm Audio WA-87 R2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | See site | See site |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Best for | Home studio podcasters in acoustically untreated rooms who need maximum noise rejection | Studio-focused podcasters who want professional multi-pattern condenser flexibility without spending on a Neumann |
Key features
Rode Procaster
- Dynamic cardioid XLR, no phantom power required
- Frequency response 75 Hz to 18 kHz
- Internal pop filter built into the capsule housing
- Output impedance 320 ohms, sensitivity -56 dB
- Heavy-duty all-metal body with RM2 stand mount included
- 10-year warranty from RODE
Warm Audio WA-87 R2
- Frequency response 20 Hz to 20 kHz
- Switchable 80 Hz high-pass filter and -10 dB pad
- Large-diaphragm FET condenser XLR, requires 48V phantom power
- Three polar patterns: cardioid, omni, and figure-8
- NOS Fairchild transistor and Cinemag USA output transformer
- Maximum SPL 125 dB (132 dB with pad engaged)
Pros and cons
Rode Procaster
Pros
- Tight polar pattern makes untreated rooms sound much better
- Internal pop filter eliminates plosives without external gear
- Broadcast-proven frequency curve - purpose-built for voice
- RODE's industry-leading 10-year warranty
Cons
- Needs a preamp with solid clean gain - low-output dynamic
- Narrowed frequency range means less versatility for instruments
- Heavier than many comparably-priced dynamics at 645 g
Warm Audio WA-87 R2
Pros
- Three polar patterns enable cardioid, omni, and figure-8 recording configurations
- Premium passive components (Fairchild NOS transistor, Cinemag transformer) at accessible price
- U87-inspired voicing with full, present character
- High SPL ceiling handles a wide range of sources
Cons
- Condenser sensitivity demands acoustic treatment
- Requires 48V phantom power
- Multi-pattern capability is underutilized in basic solo podcast setups
The verdict
Choose Rode Procaster if
Home studio podcasters in acoustically untreated rooms who need maximum noise rejection.
The Procaster is one of the best purpose-built podcast dynamics on the market. Rode stripped away everything that a broadcast voice mic does not need - wide frequency extension, multiple polar patterns, pads and filters - and built a tight,…
Choose Warm Audio WA-87 R2 if
Studio-focused podcasters who want professional multi-pattern condenser flexibility without spending on a Neumann.
The WA-87 R2 is the most honest U87 homage on the market - Warm Audio builds it with premium passive components and does not hide what they are doing. The cardioid pattern sounds full and detailed, with the characteristic presence…