MOTU M4 vs RØDECaster Pro II
A side-by-side look at MOTU M4 and RØDECaster Pro II for podcasters: pricing, features, and where each one wins.
MOTU M4
Four inputs of Sabre32 quality with a metering display that earns its keep
See site
Check price on AmazonAt a glance
| MOTU M4 | RØDECaster Pro II | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | See site | See site |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Best for | Producers and podcasters who need four simultaneous inputs with reference-grade conversion and proper hardware metering | - |
Key features
MOTU M4
- -129 dBu EIN mic preamp noise floor
- 2 XLR/TRS combo inputs with 48V phantom power (front)
- 2 balanced TRS line inputs (rear)
- 4 balanced DC-coupled TRS outputs
- ESS Sabre32 Ultra DAC, 120 dB dynamic range
- Full-color LCD meters, 2.5 ms round-trip latency at 96 kHz
RØDECaster Pro II
Pros and cons
MOTU M4
Pros
- Same class-leading noise specs as the M2, four inputs
- DC-coupled outputs for modular synthesis integration
- Four balanced outputs for flexible monitoring
- Full-color LCD covers all four I/O channels
Cons
- Windows drivers require more attention than on Mac
- No MIDI I/O
- Rear line inputs are less convenient for instrument switching
RØDECaster Pro II
The verdict
Choose MOTU M4 if
Producers and podcasters who need four simultaneous inputs with reference-grade conversion and proper hardware metering.
Everything that makes the M2 exceptional applies here, plus two extra line inputs for synths, drum machines, or an outboard mixer. The four balanced outputs let you run studio monitors plus a second pair or an external headphone amp -…