Audio-Technica BP40 vs Elgato Wave:3
A side-by-side look at Audio-Technica BP40 and Elgato Wave:3 for podcasters: pricing, features, and where each one wins.
Audio-Technica BP40
Large-diaphragm dynamic with a hypercardioid pattern for demanding broadcast environments
See site
Check price on AmazonAt a glance
| Audio-Technica BP40 | Elgato Wave:3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | See site | See site |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Best for | Broadcast and radio-style podcasters who want the noise rejection of a dynamic with more diaphragm surface than a standard moving coil | - |
Key features
Audio-Technica BP40
- Frequency response 50 Hz to 16 kHz
- Large-diaphragm hypercardioid dynamic XLR, no phantom power required
- 37mm moving-coil capsule on internal flexible suspension
- Switchable 100 Hz low-frequency roll-off
- Output impedance 450 ohms, weight 632 g
- Deep null points at 120 and 240 degrees off-axis
Elgato Wave:3
Pros and cons
Audio-Technica BP40
Pros
- Hypercardioid pattern provides exceptional off-axis rejection
- Large diaphragm dynamics capture more detail than small-capsule alternatives
- Internal mechanical shock isolation reduces stand vibration
- No phantom power required
Cons
- Hypercardioid sweet spot is narrow - off-axis coloration is significant
- Heavy at 632 g - requires a sturdy boom arm
- Needs a quality preamp with adequate gain for dynamic mic levels
Elgato Wave:3
The verdict
Choose Audio-Technica BP40 if
Broadcast and radio-style podcasters who want the noise rejection of a dynamic with more diaphragm surface than a standard moving coil.
The BP40 is unusual - it gives you the noise rejection and simplicity of a dynamic microphone with a capsule size closer to a studio condenser. The hypercardioid pattern is tighter than the SM7B's supercardioid, which is a serious advantage…