Head to head

AKG K371 vs Sennheiser HD 380 Pro

A side-by-side look at AKG K371 and Sennheiser HD 380 Pro for podcasters: pricing, features, and where each one wins.

AKG K371

Closed-back reference headphone engineered to AKG's own frequency target - foldable for the road

See site

Check price on Amazon

Sennheiser HD 380 Pro

The HD 280's quieter, more refined sibling with an even flatter frequency response

See site

Check price on Amazon

At a glance

AKG K371Sennheiser HD 380 Pro
Starting priceSee siteSee site
Free planNoNo
Free trialNoNo
Best forPodcasters and producers who want a modern closed-back with flat reference tuning and portable foldable designProducers who want a step up from the HD 280 Pro with a flatter, more refined monitoring character and replaceable cable

Key features

AKG K371

  • 5 Hz - 40 kHz frequency response
  • Closed-back, over-ear, foldable design
  • 50mm drivers tuned to AKG Reference Response target
  • 32 ohm impedance - no amp required
  • Three detachable cables: 3m coiled, 3m straight, 1.2m straight
  • Oval ear cups for passive noise isolation

Sennheiser HD 380 Pro

  • Closed-back, circumaural folding design
  • Up to 32 dB passive noise attenuation
  • 8 Hz - 27 kHz frequency response
  • 54 ohm impedance
  • THD less than 0.1% at 1 kHz, 100 dB SPL
  • Detachable and replaceable coiled cable

Pros and cons

AKG K371

Pros

  • Flat, reference-tuned response matched to the Harman target
  • Three cable options cover all use cases
  • 32-ohm impedance works from any interface or device
  • Foldable for travel without sacrificing studio-grade accuracy

Cons

  • Foldable mechanism adds plastic to the build
  • Oval ear cups require adjustment to fit some head shapes
  • Bass extension can sound slightly soft versus V-shaped alternatives

Sennheiser HD 380 Pro

Pros

  • Excellent passive isolation at 32 dB - matches the HD 280 Pro
  • Lower distortion and flatter response than the HD 280 Pro
  • Replaceable detachable cable - longer lifespan
  • Better comfort on extended sessions than the HD 280 Pro

Cons

  • Higher price than the HD 280 Pro for incremental improvements
  • Coiled cable is long for desktop use
  • Less widely available than the HD 280 Pro

The verdict

Choose AKG K371 if

Podcasters and producers who want a modern closed-back with flat reference tuning and portable foldable design.

The K371 is one of the most technically accurate closed-back headphones at its price, and the measurement community noticed it early - it closely follows the Harman target curve, which correlates well to what most people perceive as neutral and…

Read the full AKG K371 review →

Choose Sennheiser HD 380 Pro if

Producers who want a step up from the HD 280 Pro with a flatter, more refined monitoring character and replaceable cable.

The HD 380 Pro is Sennheiser's professional closed-back that most audio engineers consider the more accurate companion to the HD 280 Pro. The frequency response is smoother, the THD is lower, and the detachable coiled cable is a practical improvement…

Read the full Sennheiser HD 380 Pro review →

The best new podcast tools, every week

One short email with the tools and gear worth your time. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.